I recently read in an editorial by a liberal newspaper that stated the people who oppose the United Nations treaty on banning firearms are merely misled and are deceived, or they are trying to scam the American people. Sad to say the liberal newspaper is the one doing the scamming and the deceiving. They only tell the people what they want the people to hear and they also tell it in a deceiving way. They always seem to leave something out of their reporting.
Missing from the article that I read was the fact of what our constitution reveals, to the American people, in Article VI:
“This constitution, and the Laws of the United States which shall be made in Pursuance thereof; and all Treaties made, or which shall be made, under the authority of the United States, shall be the supreme Law of the Land and the Judges in every State shall be bound thereby, any Thing in the constitution or Laws of any State to the Contrary notwithstanding.”
What if this “archaic (outdated and pre-historic) document, that is known as our constitution” as Obama proclaimed, when he was a member of congress, and declared to the American people in 2008, is ignored and overlooked. How will the judges, in this country, rule on this new law that the United Nations Wants to impose on the American people if they believe the constitution is a “changing document” and how will they decide what the foundering fathers meant?There are two things that Obama and his liberal friends would like to change and that is the Bible (which will always be because God’s Word changes not) and the constitution of these United States which the American people have lived by for hundreds of years. I submit that the liberal news. The liberals, and Obama are the ones that are mislead.
The editorial then mentions that the treaty says small arms would be managed and controlled by “international standards.” It also quotes that the treaty “recognizes the right of nations to control arms within their own territory.” Recently, we have heard politicians say that if they had the votes, they would tell the American people to “turn all their guns in. So much or the constitution.
Lastly, it informed the American people that this treaty will make no difference one way or the other. So my question is to the liberal newspaper, Obama, and the liberals is this, why have it? Why has such a treaty if it makes no difference? The truth of the matter is nations that do not get all the facts before passing new laws never make a good example for the rest of this world.